In this debate , we will examine whether our education system should take a more proactive role in addressing the impact of digital culture—particularly the potentially harmful influence of certain online personalities—on young minds. This debate invites us to consider several critical questions:

• The Case for Education:
  Proponents argue that in an era dominated by digital communication, it is imperative for schools to equip students with the skills to critically assess online content. By integrating lessons on media literacy and the potential toxicity of some internet influencers, educational institutions can help foster resilience, critical thinking, and responsible digital citizenship. Supporters of this approach point to research that suggests early education in these areas can empower young people to navigate the complex online environment safely.

• Counterarguments and Concerns:
  On the other hand, critics express caution over the role of schools in what some view as a highly specialised area of digital culture. They worry that such educational programmes might inadvertently cast influencers in a uniformly negative light, potentially stifling creativity and entrepreneurial expression. There is also concern about overstepping into areas traditionally managed by families and communities, raising questions about the balance between public education and personal freedom.

Throughout our debate, we encourage participants to consider these perspectives critically and to engage in a dialogue that honours both the potential benefits and the complexities of integrating digital literacy into school curricula. Let us reflect on the broader implications for our society and, in the spirit of historical leaders like Churchill and Kennedy, approach this discussion with determination, open-mindedness, and a commitment to forging a well-informed future.

Thank you for being here, and we look forward to a robust and enlightening debate.